052/052B Class Destroyers

usaf0314

Junior Member
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Continued...
11885874475_524dbd612d_o.jpg

so as a naval newbie, i gotta ask... from all the phase array radars I've seen, none of them has a array feed like the Type 052C/D or is that not what the pole is under the radar is...
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

With the new larger naval gun mount in the face of the Type 730, doesn't that reduce the Type 730's firing angles and therefore coverage and effectiveness? If so, why didn't the design heighten the Type 730 base by a few feet? I guess it then gets in the way of the AEGIS-type radar?

My understanding is that the chance of a missile hitting almost head on is smaller compared to other angles; and you can always go full rudder to get a better firing angle for the CWIS.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

please stop hot linking this many photos on one page. If you want, post a few per post. None of these photos are new, please pick the ones you think are the most relevant and post those. And I do ask you to put it on an online imaging hosting site rather than linking someone else's traffic.
 

by78

General
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

For you, Jeff. This photo from past week had only existed in low-resolution, until now...

11946224275_f4e3e06551_o.jpg
 

by78

General
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

please stop hot linking this many photos on one page. If you want, post a few per post. None of these photos are new, please pick the ones you think are the most relevant and post those. And I do ask you to put it on an online imaging hosting site rather than linking someone else's traffic.

FYI, Flickr is an online image hosting site, with UNLIMITED bandwidth. Linking from Flickr is prohibited, unless the photos are under public license, and mine most definitely are.

As for posting photos that are not 'new', I have stated that I would not do so in the future.

I think both our positions are now crystal clear. Cool?
 
Top